
The End League #1
Writer: Rick Remender
Pencils: Mat Broome
Inks: Sean Parsons
Colors: Wendy Brome
Publisher: Dark Horse Comics
Price: $2.99
You ever wonder why we fear the end of the world? It's not the death stuff. We are all going to die and you have a greater grasp on that than you think you do. No, most people are afraid of being uncomfortable. Having to find food, shelter, all those neat little tidbits. I'm sort of looking forward to the Mad Max portion of this little circus ride, but that's just me. Anyhow, The End League hits some of these major points, with some style along the way.
The story starts with the Astonishman killing a nice alien race by mistake and causing a nuclear disaster that kills billions and changes the survivors into mutants. Cool? Yes it is. Hit with the classic guilt bomb, Astonishman forms the End League to save the world the best he can. Thor is somehow involved, somehow. There's no food. All the mutant bad guys are weird, etc. You can fill in the blanks from here.
The writing is good, if not a bit heavy handed. Ok, the world is in shambles. Alright, it's the dude's fault. We get it. But the premise keeps repeating itself over and over again. It's great for the first few pages, to warm us up. After that, we can get through the rest of the story on our own, hey, thanks. It has me worried about how long the book can push on ahead. Comics based on a cool premise is great and works for a limited time. Once the premise gets either old or boring, the comic usually falters.
There is something about the art that bothers me, too. I can't put my finger on it. But, some of the faces seem either unemotional, or not emotional enough. I can't call it. After a few pages, it just looks boring. This might become better over time, but its annoying me now.
Good comic, overall. I'm eager to see this new push by Dark Horse. They are great publishers who have never let me down in the past.
RATING: 4/5
New Exiles #1
Writer: Chris Claremont
Pencils: Tom Grummett
Inker: Scott Hanna
Publisher: Marvel Comics
Price: $2.99
In my line of work, what I dislike is brighter than what I like. I'm not exactly sure why that is. I think, maybe, It's because I only align myself with things I like and I'm forced to be around things I don't like. More commonly, as a writer, it is easier to write about things you hate. It makes for better writing and it is just more interesting. For example, I hate Chris Claremont. I mean, I really, really do. There has never really been a point where I liked the guy. Granted, he's written some of the most impacting and interesting X-men stories ever. This is true. But he also has written some really, really bad ones. Does the man get a pass for the good things he's done? Does he get to write a whole decade of crap just because of two decades of brilliance? I guess so.
Well, I mean, New Exiles isn't a bad comic. The premise is actually pretty cool. A group of mutants are charged with saving the mulitverse. Yeah, Marvel has multiple universes and each one is different and blah, blah, blah. The Exiles are charged with making sure that certain events in each multiverse don't cause that particular multiverse to blow up. They live in this really strange Pink crystal castle and they hang out and they have all this cool tech and crap like that. It is the typical formula. Here is some math for you. A group of people who sort of hate each other but want to sleep with each other + A constant situation they have to deal with + a big base to hang out in = a superhero book from the Nineties.
I'm sure Chris Claremont thinks that his New Exiles is the most unique and interesting thing since HD porn, but it isn't. I've seen it before. We all have. There is nothing unique or interesting about it. The only reason to read this comic is to have connections to characters that have been killed off or messed up in the Marvel universe proper. Psylocke, Sabertooth, and Rogue are all here and all, basically interesting. There is a young Kitty Pryde who is really annoying and this Morph character gets on my nerves. I'm not sure why Chris Claremont has to have so many women in his book. I guess he thinks we are all still twelve and will buy anything with boobs on the cover. The shining gem here is Tom Grummett's art with Scott Hanna's inks. Great, just simply great. This art is as solid as you can get. Its not really worth buying the book for, but it is a bonus. New Exiles is for X-men fans. Don't add this too your budget unless you get X withdrawals once a week or so.
RATING: 3/5
Recently, our homey little newsletter got a letter from Alex Sheikman, who worked on Robotika: For a Few Rubles More. I don't know exactly what Alex did on this book, so I'll say he was the President. Anyway, in this letter, Alex Sheikman, President of Robotika: For a Few Rubles more, said the following:
Hi Bryan,
My name is Alex Sheikman and I am the writer/artist
on Robotika:FAFRM. I got a link to your review from someone on the ASP
forum and got to read your thoughts on the book.
Of course I am sorry
that you did not enjoy the book and I laughed when I read your "Matrix...oh,
wait Matrix Reloaded" line. I loved Matrix, but was totally turned off by
Reloaded.
You bring-up an interesting question about sequels and how
they need to dove tail into the original series. I did struggle a lot with
how much I should review/re-cap. In the end I tried to make the second arc
accessible to new readers, but definitely it would be a much richer
experience if you were familiar with the first mini...truth be told, if I was
a better writer I probably be able to do both at the same time :)
Also thank you for the kind words about the artwork. I think every
issue has been getting better (art and story). I just finished #3 and am now
starting on #4, which I think will be the best of all the 8
issues.
Hope you will give #2 a try :)
Best,
Alex-
Well, first off Alex, I'd like to thank you for your feedback. Not a day goes by that I don't send Geoff Johns or Jeph Loeb a copy of one of Jarvis's reviews with a subject line of "FREE MONEY FROM YOUR FRIEND REPLY NOW" and yet they never reply, not even when I mention ci@lis or add L@@K to the end of the message.
Second, I'd like to ask you if you've ever talked to anybody on the internet. Sure, maybe Jarvis's review was more or less positive, and you addressed his criticisms in a reasonable manner, but that's no way to talk to anyone. Your goal when you talk to someone on the internet is to make sure that, by the end of the conversation, neither of you regards the other as a human being. Calling Jarvis "Bryan" was a good start, although that was really my fault since I just realized the "archives" link goes to a page labeled BRYAN SANDALA'S REVIEW CORNER. So, I've decided to play editor to your letter and maybe, one day, you too can be like John Byrne! Except with more drawing skill.
You're familiar with an editor right? As opposed to, say, Geoff Johns! (DEAR GEOFF JOHNS I WANT TO TALK TO YOU AND I THINK YOU'RE HANDSOME PLEASE REPLY) Anyway, let's run down a some of your phraseology and see how it could spice up the conversation and make you a mortal e-enemy!
My name is Alex Sheikman and I am the writer/artist
on Robotika:FAFRM. I got a link to your review from someone on the ASP
forum and got to read your thoughts on the book.
This is a fairly common mistake. You're explaining the whole context for the conversation in a reasonable way. You don't want to waste that many words on something as useless as an explanation of what you're talking about. Why not try something a little more pithy? For example, you could have said something like this: "YOU SUCK."
That really "catches the eye"! Also, I know Jarvis, and there's nothing he responds to better than constant angry beratement. Assume that all people are like Jarvis. I know I do.
Of course I am sorry
that you did not enjoy the book and I laughed when I read your "Matrix...oh,
wait Matrix Reloaded" line. I loved Matrix, but was totally turned off by
Reloaded.
Whenever writing an internet message to someone, be it an e-mail, forum post, or readme.txt, you need to avoid what professionals call "empathy words" like "love," "laugh," or "sorry." Instead, try using key "rage words" like "hate," "fume," or "blind with murderous, fuming, hatred."
You bring-up an interesting question about sequels and how
they need to dove tail into the original series. I did struggle a lot with
how much I should review/re-cap. In the end I tried to make the second arc
accessible to new readers, but definitely it would be a much richer
experience if you were familiar with the first mini...truth be told, if I was
a better writer I probably be able to do both at the same time :)
Here you're making the mistake of admitting fault in any way. In any internet conversation or physical combat, if your opponent finds a weakness, they will exploit it. Admitting you have any room for improvement in any aspect of your life is like starting a knife fight by saying, "Hey, could you stay on my right side? I really favor it, and if you were to move a little to my left I would aaaaaarrrgggghhhhhh--" You trailed off there because you got stabbed while you were talking. So, also, less talking in general.
Also thank you for the kind words about the artwork. I think every
issue has been getting better (art and story). I just finished #3 and am now
starting on #4, which I think will be the best of all the 8
issues.
What are you doing? "Thank you"? "I think"? These words convey doubt--and any doubt at all reveals weakness to your enemy. If you were in any way unsure of your opinion, you wouldn't be saying it, would you? You know what we call people who change their opinions about things in America? Terrorists. Or, even worse, liberals.
Hope you will give #2 a try :)
Again, you use the "empathy words." You shouldn't "hope" Jarvis does anything for you. In fact, Jarvis should be dead to you, otherwise you wouldn't be writing an email to him. You should make it clear that the instant his opinion slightly differed from yours, he became worthless. You have more than enough fans and you don't need him at all. And what if you don't actually have any fans? That's fine, because your work is operating at a higher level and won't be appreciated until after your death and they invent a hat that can make people smart enough to understand it.
Best,
Alex-
Until there's a special font you can use to make text sound really sarcastic when you read it in your head, I'd stay away from signing your name with that. In fact, I'd stay away from signing your name at all. It's best not to let your enemy know who they're dealing with. In fact, I'm pretty sure Sun Tzu said something about it. He was a smart guy. Have you considered ending all your correspondences with, I don't know..."YOU SUCK"?
So, how would I have phrased this letter? Glad you asked! Here's what a little bit of work can do to take an ordinary correspondence and turn it into an exhausting battle of wills:
Hi Bryan,
YOU SUCK
Of course I am blind with murderous, fuming hatred that you did not enjoy the book and I fumed when I read your "Matrix...oh, wait Matrix Reloaded" line. I hated Matrix, almost as much as I hated you.
Did I mention that YOU SUCK
Oh, I'm glad you could at least see how awesome my art is. Every issue has been getting better (art and story). I just finished #3 and am now starting on #4, which I know will be the best of all comic books.
Don't read #2, me and my fans agree you aren't worth the book's time. :)
YOU SUCK
P.S. - We should start a letter-writing campaign to try to get Geoff Johns to have lunch with that editor dude. They would be great friends I think.
NEXT WEEK: Pictures of Geoff Johns with captions about what his beard feels like!